CSA Global congratulates Technical Director, Dr Maxim Seredkin, on his recently accepted technical paper, ‘Economic Assessment of In-Situ Recovery Projects.’
Dr Seredkin will present at the upcoming ALTA 2021 Conference between 13-20 November in Perth, Western Australia.
ALTA 2021 is a world-class annual metallurgical conference that will run both in-person and virtually and is well-known for providing exceptional opportunities for the industry to share ideas, innovations, technologies and projects, and develop new industry connections.
In-situ recovery (ISR) transfers hydrometallurgical processing of mineralised bodies to the subsurface to directly obtain solutions of dissolved metal from the target commodities. As a result, there is little surface disturbance. For ISR to be successful, however, deposits need to be permeable. Furthermore, mineral commodities need to be readily amenable to dissolution by leaching solutions over a reasonable period, with an acceptable consumption of leaching reagents.
ISR projects comprise the following components:
- Lixiviant preparation module (or alternatively the use of a pre-prepared lixiviant)
- Wellfield blocks where ISR is occurring
- Processing plant for processing solutions
- Refinery plant for production of the final product from the eluate or extractant.
Estimation of operating expenditure (OPEX) and capital expenditure (CAPEX) for lixiviant preparation, and processing plant and refinery plant construction is common and is carried out in the same manner as conventional mining projects.
OPEX requirements for ISR should be estimated based on the liquid to solid (L/S) ratio, which reflects how much solution (m3) is required to reach the target extraction of a specific commodity for one tonne of ore. CAPEX for wellfield construction cost is spread almost over the whole life of mine (LoM) and may also be regarded as OPEX.
The following pregnant solution cut-off grades are defined for ISR projects:
- The breakeven cut-off grade for pregnant solutions is based on OPEX without the cost of operation block construction. Breakeven cut-off grades should be used for termination of the operation of blocks/production wells. If the cost of processing and leaching is higher than the revenue from the useful component in solutions, then the well is terminated.
- The full cut-off grade for pregnant solutions is based on the full cost of mining and processing solutions – wellfield construction cost and OPEX. The full cut-off grade is used for selection of cells/blocks for the LoM plan.
The best way to estimate the full cut-off grade and therefore the selection of mineralisation for the LoM Plan is to determine the operational cells where the profit is >US$0 where:
Profit of Cell = Revenue – OPEX – Cost of Cell Construction
One of the most significant benefits of ISR mines is the ability to construct the mine in modules, commencing with minimal capacity. OPEX is contingent on the capacity of the ISR operation.
ISR allows the most profitable blocks to be scheduled first, with re-investment of cash flow to further develop the operation and increase capacity.
Dr Maxim Seredkin
Dr Seredkin has more than 18 years’ experience in exploration, mining production and resource estimation. He has experience in a range of commodities and reporting codes (including JORC and NI43-101). Maxim is particularly sought after in industry and academia for his expertise in uranium, he has in-depth experience across a range of geological settings and deposit types. He has specialist skills in the application of in-situ recovery for uranium extraction. In addition to uranium expertise, Maxim has experience in bauxite, rare earths and iron ore. Maxim has a strong scientific background, with research experience in ore genesis, petrology and the mineralisation of carbonatite, alkaline and ultramafic complexes, in hydrothermal-metasomatic gold and tungsten deposits.